Probation in China is a test period, not an exemption from proof. What tribunals actually check, and the paper trail to build on day one.
Foreign employers often treat probation as a no-strings trial: if the arrangement is not working, the company says goodbye and moves on. In China the logic runs the other way. The employee can leave on three days' notice during probation, but the employer needs evidence and a documented process to end the contract.
Article 21 of the Labor Contract Law bars termination during probation except on the grounds in Article 39 and Article 40(1)–(2), and requires the employer to explain its reasons to the employee. The most common basis is Article 39(1): the employee is proven not to meet the recruitment conditions during probation. That one word puts the burden on the employer.
Company B, a Singapore-based cross-border e-commerce firm, hired an operations manager in Shenzhen through an EOR: a three-year contract with a six-month probation, within the legal cap. The offer and contract came from the EOR's standard template, with only the title, salary and start date filled in.
The job description was a single line about store operations and campaign execution, and the recruitment-criteria clause read simply that the employee meets the company's job requirements. After onboarding, the manager at HQ gave a few rounds of verbal feedback on video calls. There were no written targets and no signed review records.
At the end of month five, HQ was unhappy with results and asked the EOR to let the employee go while still on probation. The EOR asked Company B for three things: written recruitment criteria, probation review records and factual evidence of non-compliance. Company B had none of them.
Cross-time-zone internal approvals then dragged on for nearly another month. By the time the termination notice went out, probation had ended days earlier. The employee filed for arbitration, claiming unlawful termination.
The statutory test is narrow, and in practice tribunals examine the paperwork around it. In probation disputes, courts typically look at four things.
Company B failed the first three. A template phrase about meeting job requirements proves nothing, verbal feedback is not an assessment record, and the notice arrived days late.
Legally the EOR, as employer of record, answered the claim. Under the service agreement the cost flowed straight back to Company B, which is the part of the arrangement most clients only read after something has gone wrong.
The three routes out of a probation hire are not priced equally.
For an employee with six months to a year of service, N is one month's salary, so 2N is two months. On paper that looks survivable. Add months of arbitration, legal fees, an unfilled role and management time, and the number that matters is no longer the settlement figure.
It is also worth separating capability from paper. A manager who genuinely was not suitable still wins if the file cannot show what the standard was and when it was missed.
The fix happens before the new hire starts, not in the last week of probation.
Probation gives you a window to test a hiring decision, not an exemption from proving it. Prepare the standards and the paper trail on day one, not on the day you want to say goodbye.
Company B is a composite, illustrative case, not any specific client. Consult qualified PRC employment counsel for case-specific guidance.
Our company is a China-based, one-stop recruitment + EOR provider, helping international companies hire, employ, and manage teams in China, compliantly and efficiently, from drafting employment contracts and social insurance compliance to termination and layoffs. If any of this sounds familiar, reach out to us for a free compliance check-up.
Rowint supports international companies with China recruitment, EOR employment, PEO outsourcing and entity & finance services — from Shanghai, Suzhou, Nanjing, Hangzhou, Wuxi, Changzhou and Beijing.
Talk to our China team